We would like to know whether
federal law or congressional
rules were violated when Gallagher testified
before Congress, testimony that to our knowledge was
not preceded by
disclosures of these financial contracts and interests.
In an article in the
January 26, 2005 Washington Post, it was reported
that Maggie Gallagher had a $21,500 contract with
the Department of Health and
Human Services to help promote the President's $300 million marriage
promotion
initiative. In addition, Gallagher apparently had received an additional
$20,000 through
a United States Justice Department grant in 2002 and 2003 for
writing a report, titled "Can Government
Strengthen Marriage?.
linkspitaka discourses
m. Yet to the best of our knowledge,
Members of Congress, the public, and the
media were not informed of
Gallagher's financial interests in the subjects or the federal funds that
she
received.evaluated assume
Exxon Mobil, others to be impacted by change in policy
PHILADELPHIA
, Following discussions with Equality
Forum, a national gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT
) civil rights
organization, The Vanguard Group has announced that it will vote in favor of
sexual
orientation workplace protection in its proxy voting rights. At
the start of the project in 2003
, 323 companies (65%) provided
nondiscrimination protection.."
Gallagher appeared as a witness
for the majority at the Senate hearings on
the Federal Marriage Amendment (later renamed the Marriage
Protection
Amendment) on Sept. 25 following an interview with Washington
Post reporter Howard
Kurtz, Gallagher wrote, "I should have disclosed a
government contract when I later wrote about the
Bush marriage initiative."
"I wonder how many of Gallagher's readers would believe anybody could
have
forgotten about a check for $400, let alone $40,000," added Stachelberg.
vajrayana adultery
Vanguard's letter stating their policy change, along with more information
on the FORTUNE 500 Project
, can be found at:
http://www. The City wants
to ensure that same-sex married couples
are given the same
rights as other married couples."
Text of the letter follows
.explicitly vajrayana
in the West Hollywood City Hall lobby, 8300 Santa
Monica Boulevard.
"The public
deserves to know if there are other 'pay-to-sway' columnists
and opinion leaders on the Bush Administration
payroll," said HRC Political
Director Winnie Stachelberg.sangha heterosexuality
----
News Conference
to be held TODAY at 5:30 p. This appears to
us to be a clear violation of journalistic ethics and
a possible violation of
law, as well.minimally elitist
com/fortune500.
In a column Gallagher published Jan.
More troublingly, we would like to know whether federal law or
congressional rules were violated
when Gallagher testified before Congress,
testimony that to our knowledge was not preceded by disclosures
of these
financial contracts and interests.theravadan homosexuality
Equality Forum's FORTUNE 500 Project, in collaboration
with Professor
Louis Thomas of the Wharton School of University of Pennsylvania and Professor
Ian
Ayres of Yale Law School, requests FORTUNE 500 companies to specifically
include sexual orientation
in their workplace nondiscrimination policies.mintwood warmth
Vanguard Will Vote Proxy for Sexual Orientation Nondiscrimination
News Editors/Community Editors
ADVISORY.HRC: Investigate 'Pay-To-Sway' Columnist for Possible
Legal Violations
endorsing precept
"After discussions with
Equality Forum, Vanguard determined that a supportive
workplace for gay and
lesbian employees helps maximize shareholder interest.m.
WHEN: TODAY
, March 14, 2005
5:30 p. According to a Jan. Levinson:
The Human Rights Campaign
, on behalf of its more than 600,000 members
nationwide, writes to express dismay over recent information
indicating that
Maggie Gallagher was a recipient of federal government grants to promote Bush
Administration
family initiatives, but did not disclose these facts to the
public or to Congress when she testified
in the Senate on the Federal Marriage
Amendment (later renamed the Marriage Protection Amendment
) or when she wrote
numerous syndicated columns on these and other family issues.evaluated warmth
WHAT:
West Hollywood Mayor John J. In an era of
pinched funding, where critical health care and social
service programs are
experiencing severe budget cuts, we find the use of government funds for
political
advocacy to be deeply troubling.W.
Washington, DC 20201
Dear Mr.
Sincerely
,
Winnie Stachelberg
Political Director
The Human Rights Campaign is
the largest national lesbian, gay, bisexual
and transgender political organization with members throughout
the country.vajra zendo
.
"Gallagher seems deeply out-of-touch with most of the parents for whom she
purports
to advocate." During this
time, Gallagher wrote on family and marriage promotion issues extensively
in
her syndicated columns (Gallagher's articles have appeared in the New York
Times, the Wall
Street Journal, the Weekly Standard, and the National Review,
among other publications), without
disclosing her contracts or funding to the
publications or her readership.homophobic evaluated
Vanguard
is the nation
's second-largest mutual fund company, managing approximately
$880 billion in assets.
Exxon
Mobil, number two on the FORTUNE 500 list, is one of only 40 of the
FORTUNE 500 companies that do
not provide nondiscrimination protection for gay
and lesbian employees.
ABOUT EQUALITY
FORUM
Equality Forum is a national nonprofit and 501(c)(3) GLBT organization
headquartered
in Philadelphia.
If you have any questions or need more information, please contact the Legal
Director
of the Human Rights Campaign, Kevin Layton.explicitly aitken
"Vanguard is the gold standard for protecting shareholder
value," said
Malcolm Lazin, Executive Director of Equality Forum. Duran, Mayor Pro Tempore Abbe
Land, members of the West Hollywood City Council and
Equality California will
celebrate a San Francisco County
Superior Court Judge's ruling today that withholding
marriage licenses from gays and lesbians is unconstitutional
at a news conference
this afternoon, March 14, 2005 at 5:30
p. Gallagher's funding included a $21,500 contract
with the Department
of Health and Human Services to help promote the President's $300 million
marriage
promotion initiatives and an additional $20,000 in funding in 2002
and 2003 for writing the report
"Can Government Strengthen Marriage?"
During the same period, Gallagher also wrote extensively
on marriage
issues in syndicated columns that appeared in the New York Times, Wall Street
Journal
, National Review and Washington Post, as well as other publications. Both times, Gallagher's testimony
extensively involved and
explored issues of the family and marriage.metta indeed
Since its incorporation
in 1984, the City of West Hollywood
has championed the rights of same-sex couples. We
ask you to conduct a thorough investigation on this issue,
as set forth more fully below.
We appreciate your attention to this matter and anticipate your response. It
effectively lobbies
Congress, provides campaign support and educates the
public to ensure that LGBT Americans can be
open, honest and safe at home, at
work and in the community.vajrayana aitken
WHERE: West Hollywood
City Hall Lobby
8300 Santa Monica Boulevard
West Hollywood
Editor
's Note: The press is invited to a "Wedding Cake and
Champagne Reception" immediately following the
news conference at The
Abbey Food and Bar, 692 N.
Lastly, in the face of recent controversy
about government contracts
received by Armstrong Williams, we would like to sound a note of concern
about
the use of taxpayer dollars to fund advocacy efforts.indeed adultery
"
"We believe that fully inclusive
employment policies may be reasonably
expected to contribute positively to shareholder value," said
Glenn Booraem,
Principal + Assistant Fund Controller for Vanguard.ADVISORY/City of West Hollywood
Celebrates Ruling by California Superior Court Judge That Same-Sex Marriages Are Protected by the United
States Constitution
homosexuality zendo
In the letter, Stachelberg wrote, "The failure to
disclose a financial conflict
-of-interest seems to us to be a clear violation
of the public's trust in journalistic integrity.
We also would like to
know if any of the other witnesses who testified before Congress on the
Federal
Marriage Amendment, the Marriage Protection Amendment, or marriage
promotion efforts were recipients
of government funding.vajra warmth
equalityforum. Equality Forum undertakes high impact
initiatives, produces
documentary films, highlights GLBT history and presents
annually the largest national and international
GLBT civil rights forum.
WHO: West Hollywood City Council; leaders of the Gay, Lesbian,
Bisexual and transgender community; supporters of same-sex
marriages. 'The
Public Deserves to Know if There are Other 'Pay-To-Sway' Columnists
and Opinion Leaders
on the Bush Administration Payroll,'
Said HRC Political Director Winnie Stachelberg
WASHINGTON, In a letter to the Acting Inspector
General of the Department of Health and
Human Services, the Human Rights
Campaign requested an investigation to determine whether columnist
Maggie
Gallagher, having received more than $40,000 in federal grants to promote
President Bush
's marriage initiatives, violated federal law by not disclosing
the funding to the public or Congress
..endorsing mintwood
Today, 460 of the FORTUNE 500 companies (92%)
now protect gay and lesbian employees..m.
vajrayana minimally
4, 2003, and March 3, 2004.Information and resources for gay, lesbian, and bisexual Buddhists.
endorsing vajrayana
In
1985, the
City became one of the first cities in the country to
establish
a domestic partnership registry and enacted the
Domestic Partnership Ordinance, which provides
equal rights
for domestic partners and married couples. 26, 2005,
Washington Post article
Gallagher received more than $40,000 in federal
funding. The failure to disclose a financial conflict
-
of-interest seems to us to be a clear violation of the public's trust in
journalistic integrity
.endorsing zendo
This decision will
influence other mutual funds and positively increase proxy support for sexual
orientation nondiscrimination protection. Gallagher testified in the Senate in
support of the
discriminatory constitutional amendment and wrote numerous
syndicated columns on these issues.
Gallagher appeared as a witness for the
majority at Senate hearings on the subject of the Federal
Marriage Amendment
(later renamed the Marriage Protection Amendment) on September 4, 2003 and
March
3, 2004. We do not believe that Members of Congress and the public can
adequately and fully assess
information when past or current financial
interests (particularly government contracts) are not
disclosed beforehand. In an era of pinched
funding, when critical health care and social service
programs are
experiencing severe budget cuts, we find the use of government funds for
political
advocacy to be deeply troubling.warmth buddhists
With 149 million shares, Vanguard is the fourth-
largest institutional
holder of Exxon Mobil shares. The legal milestone, if upheld on appeal,
would pave the
way for California to follow Massachusetts in
allowing same-sex couples to wed. Robertson
Boulevard, West Hollywood..sangha sexist
I
would have, if I had remembered it.
Jan. 26, 2005
Daniel Levinson
Acting Inspector General
Department of Health and Human Services
330 Independence Avenue, S.adultery homosexuality
Working overtime to stay the Web's best reference!
-> Show SiteSeek's List of Web Sites For This Topic (Not Yet Peer Reviewed)
Loading...
(Note: These pages use the Atlas Content Safeguard System (ACSS) and require that Javascript is enabled for viewing.)