Why the Future Doesn`t Need Us

technological dangers

www.tecsoc .org/innovate/focusbilljoy.htm

wait technological

A response to the recent feature "Why the future doesn`t need us" by Bill Joy, of Sun Microsystems.
www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html

dangers complexity

Special Focus on Bill Joy`s Hi-Tech Warning

attempting catastrophes

postrel scientist

Virginia Postrel critiques Bill Joy`s recent essay. From the Center for the Study of Technology and Society in Washington, D.Glenn Reynolds argues that attempting to prevent technological catastrophes by restricting research will only backfire.

reynolds backfire

"Our most powerful 21st-century technologies - robotics, genetic engineering, and nanotech - are threatening to make humans an endangered species .

21st apocalyptic

attempting dialogue

By Bill Joy, chief scientist at Sun Microsystems.

nanotech critiques

mercy catastrophes

21st wait

nano 21st

21st wait

Joy, to the World

doesn apocalyptic

reason.com/0006/co.vp.joy.html

joy attempting

threatening mercy

www .nationalreview.com/comment/comment070500c.html

scientist apocalyptic

Wait a Nano Second...

apocalyptic dialogue

reynolds argues

Complexity and Being at the Mercy of Machines

backfire postrel

doesn backfire

www.spark-online.com/april00/trends/wacker.html

nanotech extinction

technological threatening

An effort to continue the public dialogue started with computer scientist Bill Joy`s apocalyptic vision." [Wired magazine]

microsystems attempting

C.

threatening nanotech

 You Are Here:  > Start > Cultural > Future > Catastrophes > Human_Extinction > Technological_Dangers    ( Viewing: Web Sites For This Topic )
Working overtime to stay the Web's best reference!
Search the Web
 


SiteSeek's Directory Of Non-Peer Reviewed Sites For This Topic


- -
kjjkjk


Loading...

(Note: These pages use the Atlas Content Safeguard System (ACSS) and require that Javascript is enabled for viewing.)